Legal Opinion

Reese v. Home Budget Center

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 23, 1992PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice:

This is an appeal from a decision of the Superior Court that affirmed a denial by the Industrial Accident Board (“Board”) of a claim for medical payments asserted by the appellant, Joseph Reese (“Reese”). The Board ruled that Reese’s treatment for the emotional effects of an earlier industrial accident were not linked by substantial causation. We conclude that the Board applied an erroneous standard of recovery for the emotional effects of an industrial accident and that the Superior Court erred in the affirmance of that application. Accordingly, we reverse.

I

There is no dispute…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Culver v. BennettSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  2. DiSabatino Bros., Inc. v. WortmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  3. Lipscomb v. DiamianiSuperior Court of Delaware · 1967
  4. Duvall v. Charles Connell RoofingSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  5. General Motors Corporation v. McNemarSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Person-Gaines v. Pepco Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  2. State v. CephasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  3. Glanden v. Land Prep, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  4. Munyan v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  5. Standard Distributing Co. Ex Rel. Pennsylvania Manufacturer's Ass'n v. NallySupreme Court of Delaware · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API