Duvall v. Charles Connell Roofing
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
For over twenty-five years decisions of this Court have engrafted the “unusual exertion” rule upon our Workmen’s Compensation Law. Thus, an employee with a “pre-existing physical weakness”, whose employment aggravates that condition, is denied compensation unless it can be shown that the worker was engaged in some form of unusual exertion at the time of a job related injury. 1 Today we reexamine this rule of law and abandon it.
William Duvall appeals a decision of the Superior Court affirming the Industrial Accident Board’s denial of workmen’s compensation benefits allegedly due…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Air Mod Corporation v. NewtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- General Motors Corporation v. McNemarSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
- Gray's Hatchery & Poultry Farms, Inc. v. StevensSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950
- General Motors Corp. v. VeaseySupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- Champlain Cable Corp. v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. LakeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Histed v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- State v. CephasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Vincent v. Eastern Shore MarketsSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Standard Distributing Co. Ex Rel. Pennsylvania Manufacturer's Ass'n v. NallySupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.