Legal Opinion
Lipscomb v. Diamiani
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided February 24, 1967PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUILLEN, Judge.
This cause of action is based on negligence and arises out of an automobile accident. In the pre-trial order of January 12, 1967, the Court recognized a defense motion to amend her answer to include “a second affirmative defense, failure of plaintiffs to wear seat belts”. Actually only the plaintiff wife was injured and thus the proposed amendment goes only to her conduct.
On February 15, 1967, counsel for the defendant provided the Court with a letter memorandum in support of the proposed amendment, citing Sams v. Sams, 247 S.C. 467, 148 S.E.2d 154 (April 26, 1966) and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Plessy v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Kavanagh v. ButoracIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
- Brown v. KendrickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Mary Vizzini, Administratrix of the Estate of Salvatore Vizzini, Deceased v. Ford Motor Company C/o C. T. Corp. SystemCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Amend v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Waterson v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.