Legal Opinion

United Traction Co. v. Droogan

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1921PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to continue a temporary injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

This is a motion to have continued during the pendency of this action the temporary injunction issued herein on March 23,1921.

The “ law of strikes ” is so well settled in this state in relation to the acts herein sought to be enjoined that it is unnecessary to more than examine the case presented here to see whether the plaintiff has established a sufficiently strong prima facie case to bring it within the principles which the courts have applied in granting temporary injunctions.

After a careful examination of the law and of the facts presented by the papers before me, I find no reason for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Davis v. ZimmermanNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  3. W. P. Davis Machine Co. v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Pre' Catelan, Inc. v. International Federation of WorkersNew York Supreme Court · 1921
  5. W. B. Coon Co. v. MeinhartNew York Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Altman v. SchlesingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API