Legal Opinion

Davis v. Zimmerman

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1895PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Mark Davis against Julius Zimmerman and others. From an order continuing an injunction pendente lite, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFollett, J.

This action was begun June 21, 1895, to restrain the defendants (1) from inducing the plaintiff’s employés to leave his service by force, threats, or intimidation; (2) from preventing persons from entering plaintiff’s service by force, threats, or intimidation; (3) from destroying plaintiff’s property. This is the gist of the relief sought by the action and granted by the temporary injunction, issued June 21, 1895, and continued by an order of the special term, entered August 2G, 1895.

The plaintiff now is, and for 15 years last past has been, a manufacturer of hats and caps at the city of New…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Toledo, A. A. & N. M. Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1893
  3. Arthur v. OakesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
  4. State v. StewartSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887
  5. Sherry v. PerkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Beck v. Railway Teamsters' Protective UnionMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. People Ex Rel. Bennett v. LamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Lohse Patent Door Co. v. FuelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. McConnellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee · 1897
  5. In re Association of the BarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API