Legal Opinion

Frady v. Portland General Electric Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 30, 1981No. 111930-111936 CA 19014-19020PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

This appeal involves seven consolidated actions for nuisance and trespass. Plaintiffs appeal the dismissal of their complaints.

Three of these actions were brought by plaintiffs who own real property located in the immediate vicinity of the Bethel Combustion Turbine Facility, 1 which is owned and operated by defendant. The remaining four actions were brought by plaintiffs who reside on property near the facility. 2 All the complaints allege that the facility began operating in 1973, and that when it is in operation it emits low frequency sound waves. The complaints of the plaintiffs who own…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. MARTIN ET UX v. Reynolds Metals Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Rich v. Tite-Knot Pine MillOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Harding v. BellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Campbell v. Ford Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Raymond v. Southern Pacific CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ault v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Ault v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Carvalho v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. City of Portland v. Boeing Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2001
  5. Krein v. Szewc (In re Szewc)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API