Legal Opinion

Deas v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1968No. 1 Div. 302PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Presiding Judge.

The indictment charges (1) the manufacture of prohibited liquors; and (2) the possession of a still, etc. The verdict of the jury was guilty as charged in the indictment.

The evidence was that two officers, Mr. Tarlton and Mr. Shaw, went to a house located in Clarke County, Alabama, which ■contained a whiskey still. Mr. Shaw observed a Negro man, Miller House, tending a fire under the still, but saw no one else in the house. Mr. Shaw then moved back through the woods, circling a “good sized” ■swamp and briar patch, to meet a pickup ■car and tell them to come back later.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Hill v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. McNeel v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Cunningham v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Corbin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  2. Crafts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  3. Garsed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API