Deas v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Presiding Judge.
The indictment charges (1) the manufacture of prohibited liquors; and (2) the possession of a still, etc. The verdict of the jury was guilty as charged in the indictment.
The evidence was that two officers, Mr. Tarlton and Mr. Shaw, went to a house located in Clarke County, Alabama, which ■contained a whiskey still. Mr. Shaw observed a Negro man, Miller House, tending a fire under the still, but saw no one else in the house. Mr. Shaw then moved back through the woods, circling a “good sized” ■swamp and briar patch, to meet a pickup ■car and tell them to come back later.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Hill v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
- McNeel v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
- Cunningham v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
3Cited by3 opinions
- Corbin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- Crafts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Garsed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973