Moon v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
The defendant was indicted under two counts, the first charging manufacturing liquor, and the second the possession of a still. AYhen the evidence was all in, the 'Solicitor entered a nol. pros, as to the second count, and the trial proceeded to judgment on the first.
Stating the evidence most strongly for the state: The officers found a still in operation at which prohibited liquor was being manufactured in Chambers county,' about three miles from the home of defendant, and the officers saw defendant coming from the still with a five-gallon demijohn of whisky, which he carried over the hill…
2Cited by29 opinions
- Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Garsed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Rikard v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
- Biddle v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Gilbert v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.