McNeel v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
The three defendants, one a negro and the other two white men, were indicted jointly. The first count charged the unlawful manufacture of whisky, and, the second, the unlawful possession of a still, etc.. There was a third count, but the conviction was had on the first and second, and hence we do not consider the third.
The facts as disclosed by the record tend to prove a whisky still located on the side of a mountain in St. Clair county, remote from any habitation and in a wood near the foot of the mountain. This still had -been recently operated when the officers found it. It was still warm…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Maisel v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
- Lindsey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
- Gamble v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
- Hill v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Gamble v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
- Garsed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Deas v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1968