Legal Opinion

McNeel v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1932No. 7 Div. 860PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The three defendants, one a negro and the other two white men, were indicted jointly. The first count charged the unlawful manufacture of whisky, and, the second, the unlawful possession of a still, etc.. There was a third count, but the conviction was had on the first and second, and hence we do not consider the third.

The facts as disclosed by the record tend to prove a whisky still located on the side of a mountain in St. Clair county, remote from any habitation and in a wood near the foot of the mountain. This still had -been recently operated when the officers found it. It was still warm…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Maisel v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Lindsey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Gamble v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Hill v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. Gamble v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Garsed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  4. Deas v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API