Davis v. Carroll-Porter Boiler & Tank Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Simpson,
Plaintiff sued to recover demurrage which accrued because of defendant’s failure to promptly accept loaded freight cars consigned to it; a verdict was recovered for about one-half of the claim, judgment entered thereon and defendant appeals.
The only assignment of error relating to the evidence, complains because a witness for plaintiff (who had been shown carbon copies of certain original notices delivered to defendant), was permitted, despite its objection that those papers were not the best evidence, to answer the question: “Were those originals sent to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Griswold v. GebbieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Fuller v. Stewart Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Keck v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bailis v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Frumkin v. MayerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Dunn v. DunnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Director General of Railroads v. Pottstown Steel Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1923