Bailis v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs seek to recover damages for the defendant’s alleged breach of contract or, failing their ability to prove the contract, then on the ground of a quasi-contract because of the defendant’s alleged receipt and retention of the avails of the plaintiffs’ undertaking. The court below, to which .the case was tried without a jury, found for the defendant and entered judgment accordingly. From the findings made by the learned trial judge, which are fully supported by the-evidence, we summarize the following facts material to the questions raised by the plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hertzog v. HertzogSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
- Brock v. Real Estate-Land Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Adams Express Co. v. SchlessingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
- Wheeler & W. Mfg. Co. v. Aughey, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Juniata County1891
- Craig v. CosgroveSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Meehan v. Cheltenham TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Dworman v. Mayor & Bd. of Aldermen, Etc., MorristownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1974
- William A. Meier Glass Co. v. Anchor Hocking Glass Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- United States Gypsum Co. v. Schiavo Bros., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.