Legal Opinion
School Dist. No. 36 v. Pippin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 11, 1928No. 18788PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JEFFREY, C.
Plaintiff, Gertrude Pippin, brought this action against the defendant, school district No. 36, Love county, Okla., to recover upon a school teacher’s contract. The contract was entered into on the 26th day of March, 1926, whereby the defendant employ'ed plaintiff to teach school in said district for the school year 1926-1927, for a term of nine months at a salary of $100 per month. The contract provided that the term of school ¡-Should commence on the first Monday in August. 1926, unless otherwise agreed upon. The term of school was begun on order of the school board on July 19.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gentis v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- School Dist. No. 76 v. BathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Barney v. School Dist. No. 98Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3Cited by5 opinions
- Frisk v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF DULUTHSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Sutton v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Cooperton Cons. School Dist. No. 10 v. Roosevelt Cons. School Dist. No. 7Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- George v. Joint School District No. 5Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- School Dist. No. 36 v. ReasonerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928