Legal Opinion

School Dist. No. 76 v. Bath

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 23, 1926No. 17427PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

FOSTER C.

This was an action by Bessie Bath, defendant in error, as plaintiff, against school district No. 76 of Creek county, plaintiff in error, as defendant, to recover the sum of $1,125, alleged to be due her as salary under a contract employing defendant in error to teach a nine months’ school in said school district for the school year 1924-25. Parties will be hereinafter referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

There was a trial to the court, without the intervention of a jury resulting in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant in the sum of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gentis v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Bath v. DumasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Dill v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. School District No. 60 of Ellis County v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Consolidated School Dist. No. 6 v. Panther Oil & Grease Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Smith v. School Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Dungan v. Independent School Dist. No. 39.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Barney v. School Dist. No. 98Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API