United States Surety Co. v. Stevens Family Ltd. Partnership
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MILTON I. SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Defendants Stevens Family Limited Partnership, Thomas Stevens, Lillia Stevens, Matthew S. Stevens and Edna M. Howard (collectively “Indemnitors”1) have filed their Second Amended Answer & Affirmative Defenses (“ADs”) to Surety’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) that seeks their performance of collateralization and indemnification.2 Most recently Surety has moved to strike the ADs, and that motion has been fully briefed by the parties and is ripe for decision. For that purpose this opinion will draw upon, without any need to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States Surety Co. v. Stevens Family Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014