Legal Opinion
Penafiel v. Puretz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 15, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to *447recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Leib Puretz and Williamsboro Realty Corp., appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated November 16, 2001, as denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, as a matter of discretion, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.
“While the nature…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Frias v. FortiniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Espinal v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Kubacka v. Town of North HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Herrera v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Soto v. City of Long BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rock City Sound, Inc. v. Bashian & Farber, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Devito v. J & J Towing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Matone v. Sycamore Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Penafiel v. PuretzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004