Legal Opinion

Soto v. City of Long Beach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 18, 1993PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., (1) the defendant City of Long Beach appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), entered April 3, 1991, as (a) denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it, and (b) granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion to strike its answer, and (2) the plaintiffs cross-appeal from so much of the same order as conditioned the granting of their cross motion to strike the answer of the defendant City of Long Beach upon the failure…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Associated Mutual Insurance v. Dyland Tavern, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Espinal v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Kubacka v. Town of North HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Herrera v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Maiorino v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Birch Hill Farm, Inc. v. ReedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API