Legal Opinion

Penafiel v. Puretz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 8, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a consolidated action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Leib Puretz and Williamsboro Realty Corp. appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 1, 2004, as granted the plaintiffs’ motion to consolidate the two original actions and (2) an order of the same court dated March 31, 2004, as denied their unopposed motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them in the action originally commenced under index No. 49611/02.

Ordered that the order dated March…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Birch Hill Farm, Inc. v. ReedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Penafiel v. PuretzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Follors v. TI Ozone Park Stor., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  2. Fox v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Niagara Venture v. Niagara Falls Urban Renewal AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API