Landaker v. Anderson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
This is a garnishment proceeding, based upon a judgment entered in favor of respondents and against the principal defendant, in an action to recover for personal injuries inflicted by an automobile operated by the defendant. The original action was defended on behalf of the defendants therein by the insurer, whose attorney alone appeared and defended the action up to the time of the entry of the judgment. After judgment, a demand was made by the defendant Anderson upon thé insurer to satisfy the judgment in accordance with the terms of the policy, which demand was not complied with.
Thereafter,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fenton v. PostonWashington Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by11 opinions
- MacEy v. CrumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Davis' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
- Philadelphia Fire & Marine Insurance v. City of GrandviewWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Sundberg v. Boeing Airplane Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
- Hinton v. CarmodyWashington Supreme Court · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.