Legal Opinion

Sundberg v. Boeing Airplane Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1958No. 34517PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.

The parties involved in this proceeding are Oscar Sundberg and Sons, a copartnership, the Boeing Airplane Company, the American Surety Company of New York, and F. B. Tilley, doing business as Ace Appliance Company. They will hereafter be referred to as Sundberg, Boeing, the surety, and Tilley, respectively.

The facts relevant to this appeal are as follows:

February 8, 1955, Sundberg entered into an extensive *736painting contract with Boeing. As required by the contract, he deposited a performance and a payment bond, both of which were issued by the surety.

July 7, 1955, Tilley commenced an action…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Willett v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Arcweld Manufacturing Co. v. BurneyWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Bassett v. McCartyWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Landaker v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Barkley v. KerfootWashington Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. F. D. Rich Co. of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1970
  2. Bushman Construction Company v. Air Force Academy Housing, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  3. Yakima Adjustment Service, Inc. v. DurandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  4. Woody's Olympia Lumber, Inc. v. RoneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  5. United Pacific Insurance v. LundstromWashington Supreme Court · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API