Philadelphia Fire & Marine Insurance v. City of Grandview
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
This action is a garnishment.
Respondent, Royal Insurance Company, Ltd., has an unsatisfied judgment against defendants, the city of Grand-view and Earle Bugge, the superintendent of its water department. Respondent seeks to recover the amount of the judgment from appellant, Northwest Casualty Company, as garnishee defendant. The action is based upon a comprehensive public liability insurance policy written by appellant for the city of Grandview. The policy was in effect at the time of the occurrence, an explosion in the home of Frank C. Russell in Grandview, which gave rise to the judgment.
Res…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Holthe v. IskowitzWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Bond v. WiegardtWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Evich v. KovacevichWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Russell v. City of GrandviewWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Isaacson Iron Works v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Woo v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Postlewait Constr., Inc. v. Great American Ins. CompaniesWashington Supreme Court · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.