Legal Opinion

United States v. Smith

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided September 16, 2010No. 10-04256MP-001-PCT-MEAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MARK E. ASPEY, United States Magistrate Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Defendant was cited for failure to pay a recreation fee, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 261.17, a misdemeanor infraction for which the maximum fine is $100 for a first offense. 1

I. Standard for granting or denying a motion to dismiss a criminal charge

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b)(2) provides “[a] party may raise by pretrial motion any defense, objection, or request that the court can determine without a trial of the general issue.” Fed. R.Crim.P. 12(b)(2) (2010). A charge may be…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adams v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. WildEarth Guardians v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API