United States v. Smith
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARK E. ASPEY, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Defendant was cited for failure to pay a recreation fee, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 261.17, a misdemeanor infraction for which the maximum fine is $100 for a first offense. 1
I. Standard for granting or denying a motion to dismiss a criminal charge
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b)(2) provides “[a] party may raise by pretrial motion any defense, objection, or request that the court can determine without a trial of the general issue.” Fed. R.Crim.P. 12(b)(2) (2010). A charge may be…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Adams v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- WildEarth Guardians v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015