Legal Opinion
Adams v. United States Forest Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 9, 2012No. 10-16711PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GETTLEMAN, District Judge:
The Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act (“REA”) prohibits the United States Forest Service from charging fees “[sjolely for parking, undesignated parking, or picnicking along roads or trail-sides,” for “hiking through ... without using the facilities and services,” and “[f]or camping at undeveloped sites.... ” 16 U.S.C. § 6802(d)(1)(A), (D) & (E). Despite these clear prohibitions, the Forest Service collects fees from all drivers who park their vehicles in a mile-wide piece of the Coronado National Forest running along the 28-mile Catalina Highway, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Estate of Prasad ex rel. Prasad v. County of SutterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Gila River Indian Community v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Martin v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2014
- Bark v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- In re Arizona Theranos, Inc., LitigationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.