Legal Opinion
Hanig v. City of Winner
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 2005No. NonePublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEIERHENRY, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Hanig’s application for the renewal of his liquor license was denied by the City of Winner. Hanig believed the public hearing on the matter was conducted improperly, and he petitioned the trial court for a writ of mandamus to compel the Winner City Council to give him a fair and impartial hearing. The writ was denied on summary judgment. We reverse.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Hanig had leased and operated the “Peacock Bar” in Winner, South Dakota since 1992. In 2002, Hanig decided to open a new steakhouse and lounge. Because there were no liquor licenses available in the City of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Buell v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. WeleckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Van Itallie v. Borough of Franklin LakesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Wyzykowski v. RizasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Eways v. Reading Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hanig v. City of WinnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Daily v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Armstrong v. Turner County Board of AdjustmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Holborn v. Deuel Cnty. Bd. of AdjustmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Oman v. OmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.