Armstrong v. Turner County Board of Adjustment
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MEIERHENRY, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Rosemary Armstrong and Al-phie Petersen (Homeowners) appeal the circuit court’s denial of a writ of certiora-ri challenging the Turner County Board of Adjustment (Board)’s approval of a conditional use permit issued to the Vi-borg Cooperative Elevator Association (Elevator). We reverse on the grounds that Homeowners did not receive due process because one of the Board members had a disqualifying interest and should not have participated as a decision maker.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
[¶ 2.] In 2006, the Elevator sought to construct a commercial grain storage…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Mordhorst v. EgertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Strain v. Rapid City School BoardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lake Hendricks Improvement Ass'n v. Brookings County Planning & Zoning CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Wedel v. Beadle County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Holborn v. Deuel Cnty. Bd. of AdjustmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Adolph v. Grant County Board of AdjustmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Dunham v. Lake Cty. CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.