Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Turner County Board of Adjustment

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 2009No. 25008PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Rosemary Armstrong and Al-phie Petersen (Homeowners) appeal the circuit court’s denial of a writ of certiora-ri challenging the Turner County Board of Adjustment (Board)’s approval of a conditional use permit issued to the Vi-borg Cooperative Elevator Association (Elevator). We reverse on the grounds that Homeowners did not receive due process because one of the Board members had a disqualifying interest and should not have participated as a decision maker.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

[¶ 2.] In 2006, the Elevator sought to construct a commercial grain storage…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. Mordhorst v. EgertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Strain v. Rapid City School BoardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lake Hendricks Improvement Ass'n v. Brookings County Planning & Zoning CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Wedel v. Beadle County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Holborn v. Deuel Cnty. Bd. of AdjustmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Adolph v. Grant County Board of AdjustmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Dunham v. Lake Cty. CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API