Legal Opinion
Pate v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 23, 2003No. CIV.A. 02-1529(RBW)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Anthony Pate, brings this action pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1971, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and on District of Columbia (“D.C.”) common law grounds. Both claims are predicated on plaintiffs proposition that the defendants violated his constitutional rights when they failed to provide him with a timely parole revocation hearing. The defendants named in the complaint include: the District of Columbia, the local entity responsible for operating the now defunct D.C. Parole Board; Margaret Quick, Chairman of the D.C. Parole Board at all…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Epps v. U.S. Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Fletcher v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Nelson v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Payne v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Lerner v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.