Legal Opinion
Fletcher v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 26, 2007No. Civil Action 01-601 (JDB)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff is a District of Columbia Code offender serving a parole revocation sentence imposed by the United States Parole Commission (“Commission”). He alleges that the Commission’s application of its reparole guidelines violated the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Constitution. Plaintiffs claims are brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). 1 His amended complaint names as defendants the Commission and present and former Commissioners in…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sellmon v. ReillyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Epps v. U.S. Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Abou-Hussein v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Wilson v. FullwoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Bond v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.