Lomax v. Walk
Oregon Supreme Court
From Union : Stephen A. Lowell, Judge. • Suit by Leroy Lomax against G. M. Walk, in which it was decreed that there were equal mutual accounts between the parties and that each party should pay his own costs. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean
This is a suit for the dissolution of an alleged partnership, and for an accounting. A statement of the facts sufficiently full and clear to exhibit the questions presented on this appeal is that on July 3, 1893, the plaintiff and defendant being equal owners of a band of about 2,500 head of sheep, the plaintiff mortgaged his interest therein to the defendant to secure the payment of a promissory note for $2,650, due eleven months after date. The mortgage provides that, if the defendant “ at any time deem himself insecure,” it shall be lawful for him to take possession of the property therein…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lee v. FoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Waite v. DennisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
- Whittemore v. FisherIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Howery v. HooverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- In re HaakeDistrict Court, D. California · 1872
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mills v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1924