Legal Opinion

Lee v. Fox

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1888No. 13,060PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

Stephen Lee commenced this suit against William R. Fox and Eliza E. Fox, wife of William R., to foreclose a mortgage executed by the latter, whereby certain real estate owned by the husband was conveyed to Lee to indemnify him against loss for having become bound as surety upon certain notes signed by Fox as principal.

It is charged in the complaint that the defendant Wm. R. Fox failed to pay the notes so executed at maturity, and that in consequence of his default the plaintiff had sustained loss and damage in the sum of one thousand dollars, which remained due and unpaid.'

Fox answered, in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Olcott v. . Tioga Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Charter v. StevensNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Patchin v. PierceNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  4. Robinson v. GlassIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Denny v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ross v. MenefeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Ulrich v. Security Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Hunter v. CronkhiteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Hartman v. RinggenbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Nichols, Shepard & Co. v. BurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API