Legal Opinion

Mills v. Williams

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOoshow, J.

The allegations in the complaint charging fraud to the defendant are not sustained by the evidence. Fraud is never presumed, but must be established by clear and convincing evidence. The plaintiff alleged fraud and had the burden of proof to establish it. In our opinion, the evidence is not sufficient to establish any fraudulent intention on the part of the defendant in either his representations or conduct in entering into the partnership relation with the plaintiff. It follows that plaintiff is not entitled to a decree canceling the quitclaim deed.

The Circuit Court found that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Swank v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Lee v. FoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Springer v. JenkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Laam v. GreenOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Waite v. DennisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1869

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Platt v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Infusaid Corp. v. Intermedics Infusaid, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  3. Infusaid Corporation and Metal Bellows Corporation v. Intermedics Infusaid, Inc., and Intermedics, Inc., Infusaid Corporation and Metal Bellows Corporation v. Intermedics Infusaid, Inc., and Intermedics, Inc., the Regents of the University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  4. R. C. Jones Cotton Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API