Legal Opinion

Howery v. Hoover

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 9, 1896PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from, Warren District Court. — Hon. J. H. Henderson, Judge. Action at law to recover for the alleged conversion of personal property. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

1 In November, 1,889, the plaintiff made two promissory notes, each of which was for the sum of eighty-eight dollars, due on the second day of November, 1890, with interest at the .rate of ten per cent, per annum. One was made payable to the defendant, and the other to David HoWery. To secure the payment of the notes, the plaintiff executed to the payees a chattel mortgage on two horses, a wagon and one set of double harness. The mortgage was duly recorded. At a subsequent time, Howery transferred his interest in the note made to him and in the mortgage, to the defendant. On the seventeenth…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Johnston & Son v. RobuckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Frick v. KabakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Citizens Bank of Millerton v. BeesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Casey v. Ballou Banking Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  5. Hartford-Carlisle Savings Bank v. ShiversSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API