Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Zurn Industries, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided June 14, 1990No. TH89-217-CPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

McKINNEY, District Judge.

This personal injury action comes before the Court on a discovery dispute concern*562ing a request for production. The issues raised have been briefed and are ready for resolution. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART both the Motion to Compel and the Motion for Protective Order.

DISCUSSION:

I. Background:

Plaintiff Gary Henderson filed this action in 1989 alleging that he was seriously injured on October 9, 1987, as a result of the defendant’s…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Debra A. And George Simon v. G.D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Harper v. Auto-Owners InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1991
  2. Hewes v. LangstonMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Allendale Mutual Insurance v. Bull Data Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  4. State Ex Rel. United Hospital Center, Inc. v. BedellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Fisher v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API