Fisher v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
TINDER, District Judge.
Plaintiff asks the court to reconsider the previous order which denied Plaintiffs August 2,1993 Motion to Compel Discovery and to now grant the Motion, compelling Defendant to produce certain surveillance videotapes and to respond to supplemental discovery. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs Motion to Reconsider will be granted and his Motion to Compel will be denied. Further, Plaintiff will not be granted leave to file the supplemental discovery requests.
I.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- John Simmons Co. v. Grier Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Marconi Wireless Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Hubbard v. State Farm Indemnity Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- Cho v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- Stern v. O'QuinnDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
- In re August, 1993 Regular Grand JuryDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1994
- Cima v. Wellpoint Health Networks, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2008
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.