Legal Opinion

State v. Galli

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1998No. 960018, 960122, 960123PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Chief Justice:

Defendant Adam B. Galli entered conditional pleas of guilty to charges of aggravated robbery in three separate cases before separate trial judges. All three cases have been consolidated for purposes of this appeal. On appeal, Galli contends that (1) the three trial courts erred in failing to suppress his confession to police; (2) Judge Pat B. Brian erred in ordering him to pay restitution to his family for amounts they forfeited when he jumped bail; and (3) Judges Glenn K. Iwasaki and Kenneth Rigtrup erred in ordering him to serve consecutive prison sentences. We consider…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. BluffUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. MoaUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. CaseyUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. FedorowiczUtah Supreme Court · 2002

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API