Legal Opinion

State v. Siegal

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1997No. 95-419PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

Defendants James Robert Siegal (Siegal), Doyle Wayne Jones (Jones) and James Jeremiah McIntyre (McIntyre) moved to suppress the fruits of a search on the ground that the warrantless use of a thermal imager violated their constitutional rights. In addition, Jones moved to dismiss the charges against him on the ground that his Fifth Amendment protection against double jeopardy had been violated. The District Court for the Fifth Judicial District, Madison County, denied the motions and Defendants appeal. We reverse.

Defendants raise the following issues on appeal:

1. Was the warrantless use of a…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Gryczan v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. KuneffMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. HamperMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. HardawayMontana Supreme Court · 2001

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API