Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. State
Montana Supreme Court
Decided October 26, 1999No. 98-066PublishedCited by 116 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson
¶1 Plaintiffs James H. Armstrong, M.D.; Susan Cahill, P.A.; Barbara Polstein, D.O.; Mindy Opper, P.A.; and Blue Mountain Clinic, filed suit in this matter seeking a determination that § 37-20-103, MCA (1995), and § 50-20-109, MCA (1995), prohibiting physician assistants-certified from performing abortions, violates the privacy, equal protection and bill of attainder provisions of the Montana Constitution. The District Court for the First Judicial District, Lewis and Clark County, granted Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, protecting the abortion practice of Armstrong and Cahill.…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by116 opinions
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- In Re the Mental Health of K.G.F.Montana Supreme Court · 2001
- Bryan v. Yellowstone County Elementary School District No. 2Montana Supreme Court · 2002
- Plan Helena, Inc. v. Helena Regional Airport Authority BoardMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- Greater Missoula Area Federation of Early Childhood Educators & Related Personnel v. Child Start, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.