Legal Opinion

State v. Kuneff

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1998No. 97-325 and 97-433PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Defendants John Kuneff (Kuneff) and Ernest Van Gawryluk (Van Gawryluk) appeal from the decision of the Thirteenth Judicial District, Yellowstone County, denying their motion to suppress.

¶2 We affirm.

¶3 In determining whether the District Court erred, we consider the following issues:

¶4 1. The standard of review for a search warrant based in part on illegally obtained evidence.

¶5 2. Whether, in the absence of the illegally obtained evidence, there was sufficient probable cause to support the issuance of the search warrant.

Standard of Review

¶6 The standard of review of a district court’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. Jay Vee Wanless, A/K/A William Earl Wanless, Douglass Scott Tompkins, Linda Aune, and Michael Eugene BeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. State v. SiegalMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. FlackMontana Supreme Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. HamperMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. HardawayMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. GoetzMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. ReesmanMontana Supreme Court · 2000

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API