Legal Opinion
Griest v. Hooey
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 5, 1954PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWitmer, J.
Petitioners ask the court to annul and set aside the action of the zoning board of appeals of the City of Corning in granting the application of the respondents, Edward Jones and Thelma B. Jones, for a variance, and authorizing the issuance to them of a permit to construct a retail tire store mostly upon lots 27 and 28 on South Place in the city of Corning.
Respondents J ones own fifteen contiguous lots, ten of which, numbered 48 through 57, front on the east side of Centerway and extend from South Place on the south to North Place on the north a distance of 230 feet, and are 130 feet deep…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Matter of Reed v. Bd. of Standards AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Hall v. LeonardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Matter of Hall v. LeonardNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Ottinger v. Arenal Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Himmel v. LeimkuehlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- United Citizens v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- Lapham v. RoulanNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Young v. ThalmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- King v. ChmielewskiNew York Supreme Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.