Legal Opinion
Lapham v. Roulan
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtG. Robert Witner, J.
Petitioners have instituted two proceedings herein, heard together, to have the court annul the decision of the respondent Board of Appeals granting to respondent William J. Maher a zoning variance. Petitioners are owners of lands adjoining or in the close neighborhood of the property with respect to which the variance was granted. Said property and the properties of petitioners lie within the Multiple Residence District of the City of Geneva, as established in ‘‘ The 1956 Zoning Ordinance ” of said city.
It appears that in 1953 a predecessor ordinance was adopted, and that prior thereto a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- People Ex Rel. Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Matter of Hickox v. GriffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Matter of Collins v. BehanNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Gilbert v. StevensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hyman v. PruittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Ardella v. EvershedNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Hattem v. SilverNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Ellison v. Board of Appeals of the City of Long BeachNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Fornaby v. FeriolaNew York Supreme Court · 1962