Legal Opinion

King v. Chmielewski

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*530OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert F. Doran, J.

In May 1987, petitioners submitted an application to the Town Planning Board of the Town of Coeymans for permission to subdivide a 6.62-acre parcel of land into two lots. That application was withdrawn because petitioners were informed the land in question was subject to deed restrictions limiting it to agricultural use only.

Subsequently, petitioners revised their application to seek approval for a four-lot subdivision. The application was submitted to the Town Planning Board for consideration at the meeting held on September 2, 1987. Proof was allegedly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Elwood Investors Co. v. BehmeNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Griest v. HooeyNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  3. East Fishkill Federation for Environmental Conservation Today v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Spinosa v. AckermanNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Town of Clinton v. DumaisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. King v. ChmielewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API