Legal Opinion

Himmel v. Leimkuehler

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 1959No. 30354PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Commissioner.

This case involves Ordinance No. 45309 as amended by Ordinance No. 47495 of the City of St. Louis, which constitute a part of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinances of that city. These ordinances will be referred to as “zoning ordinances” herein.

Bernice P. Laba and June E. Laba, owners of the property at 3828-30-32 Washington Avenue, City of St. Louis, made application to the Building Commissioner of that city for a certificate of occupancy seeking permission to erect a two-story addition to the existing building at that address. The application was denied by the Building…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Donovan v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. State Ex Rel. Nigro v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Oliver Cadillac Co. v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  4. Veal v. LeimkuehlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Atlantic National Bank v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rosedale-Skinker Improvement Ass'n v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Brown v. BeucMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Temple Stephens Co. v. WestenhaverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. State Ex Rel. Weinhardt v. Ladue Professional Building, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API