Legal Opinion
State v. Wendorf
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 19, 2012No. A11-838PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
On appeal from his conviction of failing to wear a seat belt in violation of Minn. Stat. § 169.686, subd. 1(a), appellant Wade Ross Wendorf argues that the manner in which the Revisor of Statutes published the statute deprived him of notice as to what conduct the statute proscribes in violation of due process.
FACTS
On May 24, 2010, appellant’s vehicle was stopped and he was cited for failing to wear a seat belt in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.686, subd. 1(a). Appellant pleaded not guilty and submitted to a stipulated facts bench trial in which he admitted that he was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. BussmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. PoehlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018