Legal Opinion
State v. Poehler
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 10, 2018No. A18-0353Published
1Opinion of the Court
FACTS
ISSUES
ANALYSIS
Poehler challenges the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence arising from the traffic stop. We review factual findings supporting the district court's denial of a motion to suppress for clear error, and we review its legal conclusions de novo. State v. Gauster , 752 N.W.2d 496, 502 (Minn. 2008). Poehler disputes no factual finding, so we consider de novo his assertion that the officer's observations provided no reasonable suspicion to stop him.
Poehler maintains that Officer Giese's stop violated his Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Heien v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- State v. GausterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. LicariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. DuesterhoeftSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.