Legal Opinion
Salazar v. City of Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 16, 1999No. 88,987PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
¶ 1 The dispositive issue on certiorari is whether the trial court erred in giving summary judgment to Oklahoma City [City]. We answer in the affirmative and reverse. The trial judge’s ruling on City’s issue-preclusion defense cannot be sustained. It rests on an inadequate record of the earlier federal-court action. The cause is accordingly remanded (a) for comprehensive reappraisal in light of the federal court’s entire judgment roll and (b) for re-examination of the tendered immunity issues upon an analysis we offer today.
I
THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
¶ 2 On 11 December 1992 school officials…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davidson v. CannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Manley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Broadway Clinic v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- SMITH v. CITY OF STILLWATERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Booth v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Morales v. CITY OF OKL. CITY EX REL. OKL. CITY POLICE DEPT.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.