Legal Opinion
J.k. Scanlan Co. v. Construction Group, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 2, 2003No. AC 23486PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The plaintiff appeals and the defendants cross appeal from the trial court’s order of a prejudgment remedy.1 The plaintiff, the J.K. Scanlan Company, Inc., sought such a remedy incident to its *347action against the defendants The Construction Group, Inc. (Construction Group), Midstate Metal Building Company, LLC, Northeast Panel Company, LLC, and Bertrand Rompre. The court granted the plaintiffs application for a prejudgment remedy in the amount of $42,500. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court failed to award the full amount it requested on the basis of successor…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Community Action for Greater Middlesex County, Inc. v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Bank of Boston Connecticut v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Alliance Partners, Inc. v. Oxford Health Plans, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Greenberg, Rhein & Margolis, Inc. v. Norris-Faye Horton Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Elliott v. LarsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Bebry v. ZanauskasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Morris v. CongdonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Caciopoli v. HowellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- CC Cromwell, Ltd. Partnership v. AdamesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010