Legal Opinion
Law v. Crist
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 10, 1940No. Civ. 11559PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
In 1909 the plaintiffs and their associates, including the defendants Crist and Staley, were a group working together to advance and disseminate the teachings of theosophy as expounded by the writings of H. P. Blavatsky and William I. Judge. At or about the date last mentioned they acted under the name of United Lodge of Theosophists. Until the events hereinafter to be mentioned they so acted and maintained a meeting place in Los Angeles. Similar lodges were and are in existence in populous centers in America and elsewhere. All worked and cooperated to accomplish the same general purposes.
In…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wheelock v. First Presbyterian Church of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Crocker v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Burrell v. MichauxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Hooper v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
3Cited by16 opinions
- Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. SahatiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Parker v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Rosicrucian Fellowship v. Rosicrucian Fellowship Non-Sectarian ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Ball v. American Trial Lawyers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- In Re Valley Media, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.