Legal Opinion
Roger Crane & Associates, Inc. v. Felice
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 5, 1994No. 13057-6-IIIPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
Roger Crane & Associates, Inc., and William Brooks (Crane) sued James Felice and Robert Tomlin-son d.b.a. Tomlinson South, Inc. (Tomlinson) for a portion of a real estate commission generated by the sale of Mr. Felice’s home. The court granted Tomlinson’s and Mr. Felice’s motions for summary judgment, ruling that Mr. Brooks was not the procuring cause of the sale. Crane appeals. We affirm.
Factual Background
Mr. Felice entered into an exclusive listing agreement with Tomlinson South, Inc., to sell his Spokane home. The agreement provided for a 6 percent commission in the "case of a sale or…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Grimwood v. University of Puget Sound, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
- American Legion Post No. 32 v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Multicare Medical Center v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Commodore v. University Mechanical Contractors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Leingang v. PIERCE CO. MED. BUREAU, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Leingang v. Pierce County Medical Bureau, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Syputa v. Druck, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- Miller v. Paul M. Wolff Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- PROFESSIONALS 100 v. Prestige Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.