PROFESSIONALS 100 v. Prestige Realty, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
Prestige Realty, Inc. (Prestige) appeals a judgment awarding Professionals 100 (Pro 100) one-half of a real estate commission generated by the sale of two nursing homes, together with prejudgment interest, costs and attorney fees. The judgment was entered after the trial court determined that Pro 100 was the procuring cause of the sale and had provided a buyer as required by a written contract. Prestige contends the procuring cause of sale rule does not apply and, even if it did, Pro 100 was not a procuring cause of the sale, nor did it provide a buyer as the contract required. We affirm.
FACTS
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Thor v. McDearmidCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Willis v. Champlain Cable Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- All Star Gas, Inc. v. BechardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- All Star Gas, Inc. v. BechartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Keever & Associates, Inc. v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- KEEVER & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Syputa v. Druck, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.