Legal Opinion

Whitney Bros. v. United States Secretary of Agriculture

United States Court of International Trade

Decided November 6, 2007No. Slip Op. 07-162; Court 06-00426Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GREGORY W. CARMAN, Judge.

This matter is before the court on a motion for judgment upon the agency record. Defendant, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA” or “Defendant”), moves pursuant to USCIT R. 56.1 to request that this Court affirm the agency decision by the USDA, which denied Plaintiff trade adjustment assistance (“TAA”) benefits. Plaintiff, Whitney Brothers, Inc. (“Whitney Brothers” or “Plaintiff’), argues in opposition that Defendant’s agency determination was not supported by substantial evidence and otherwise failed to adequately explain its reasoning. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API