Legal Opinion

Chibinda v. Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 2018No. 17AP-117PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrunner, J.

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Peter Chibinda and Dora Chibinda, appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting judgment on the pleadings to defendant-appellee, Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles ("BMV"). For the following reasons, we affirm that judgment.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

{¶ 2} We have examined the entire record and the affidavits submitted by the parties. While these affidavits were not attached to the complaint or the answer, they are helpful in understanding the underlying background and facts of this litigation, all the while limiting our review to the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Peterson v. TeodosioOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Moore v. City of MiddletownOhio Supreme Court · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Leneghan v. Husted (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API