Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Boland

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 19, 1975No. 29,906PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

At his trial by general court-martial, the appellant was convicted of taking indecent liberties with children under 16 years of age and of striking other children in violation of Articles 134 and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 934 and 928, respectively. The evidence against him was more than sufficient to prove his complicity in the incidents. However, no affirmative evidence was introduced by the Government as to the age of the victims. As a result, at the close of the Government’s case, the defense counsel moved for a reduction in the charges. Trial…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. FieldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  2. United States v. MorenoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  3. United States v. StarrUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  4. United States v. MorenoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  5. Lew Git Cheung v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
  2. United States v. HillU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. RollinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  4. United States v. Specialist GLENN M. BRADLEYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
  5. United States v. Specialist RICHARD A. GIFFORDArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API